W5__Hamda__Tuckman
Analysis Assignment for CCI department__
1-
Problem Definition
Since Client
Contracts and Interface Department is the final department in the Life of
project in the company which is a responsible of the plants such as Power
Plants, Water Plants during the Operation stage, so working in this department
requires a team with high performance in order to ensure that the Plants are
performing with high efficiency with a few number of trips and with high
quality of productions. Since the number of the projects increase from one
period to another and the load of works on the team members increase from one
time to another, so there are number of factors that affect on the performance
of the team. The manager of the department and in order to ensure the high
performance of the team shall identify the leadership style required to be
adopted according to the stage that the group is operating in. The topic of
this blog is using Tuckman’s Model to know in which phase of this model the department team
is operated in and which style of leadership should be adopted in order to
develop the team to achieve the department’s goals.
2- Identify the Feasible Alternative
The Forming, Storming, Norming, and Performing
model of group development was first proposed by Bruce Tuckman in 1965 who maintained that these phases are all necessary
in order to develop the team, to face up any challenges, to find the suitable
solutions in order to tackle any problem, to plan work, and to deliver results
as desired. Tuckman model explains that as the team develops maturity and
ability, relationships establish, and the leader changes leadership style.
For each phase/stage in the
Tuckman model, there is a certain style of leadership that can be used by the
team leader in order to lead the team to achieve the team goal.
Picture from: https://www.businessballs.com/managing-teams/tuckman-forming-storming-norming-performing-model-234
3-
Development of the
outcome of Alternative
The result of this assessment is coming from the questionnaire
by using Donald
Clark’s survey which
was filled by Client Contracts and Interface department's members. The
questionnaire consists of 32 statements about teamwork which are scored by
using scale as defined in the below table:
SCALE
|
RESPONSE
|
1
|
ALMOST NEVER
|
2
|
SELDOM
|
3
|
OCCASIONALLY
|
4
|
FREQUENTLY
|
5
|
ALMOST ALWAYS
|
Table 1: Scoring Scale
4- Selection Criteria
Stages
|
Average Result
(survey score)
|
Rank
|
Forming
|
23
|
3
|
Storming
|
21
|
4
|
Norming
|
31
|
2
|
Performing
|
33
|
1
|
Table 2: Survey Results
Table 2 shows the results of the average score of each
phase in the model. As shown, there is a small difference between the score of
Forming and Storming stages, and a small difference between Norming and
Performing stages. Moreover, the Performing stage has the highest score, which
means that the CCI team is in Performing Stage. And this indicates that the
team is committed to perform well.
5- Analysis and comparison of the
Alternative
The highest average score was got from the questionnaire
done by the CCI department's members is for the Performing Stages, this
indicates that the team members at this level have a clear understanding of what is required
of them at a task level, they are performing at high level, and they are able
to work towards achieving the department’s goals. The lowest average score is
for the Storming stage.
6- Selection of the preferred
Alternative
Since the CCI department's team is operated in a
Performing Stage, it requires delegated tasks and projects from the leader. So, the team leader
shall use the Delegating style of leadership.
7- Performance Monitoring and the Post
Evaluation of result
The performance of
the team can be monitored and improved by giving each member a responsibility
to ensure that the team members are working together in achieve the main goals
of the department and the teamwork. Evaluating the team work statement shall be
doing from one time to another to ensure that the team is always operating in
the Performing stage.
References:
1-
Scoring the
Tuckman Team Maturity Questionnaire Electronically. Retrieved on 5 December
2017 from http://www.phf.org/resourcestools/Documents/Electronic_Tuckman.pdf
2-
Robert Knight, Tuckman's Guide to Group Development, Retrieved on 5
December 2017, from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/tuckmans-guide-group-development-robert-knight
3-
Casablanca
Q1-2012 AACE, W1-TP-Tuckman
Analysis Assignment, Retrieved on 5 December 2017, from https://aacecasablanca.wordpress.com/2012/01/23/w1-tp-tuckman-analysis-assignment/
Great case study, Hamda..... The question is, whether or not this team is TRULY "performing" and if so, against what standard?
ReplyDeleteOne of the challenges to the Tuckman model is whether or not the team is REALLY performing or do they just think they are?
The next step is to perform some sort of process measurement, such as CPI or SPI that serves to validate whether or not the team is really performing or just think they are.
Great topic and I hope you dig more deeply into it....
BR,
Dr. PDG, Jakarta