W6_ISHAQ_Tendring_Process



Problem Definition

We are working to procure a Market Management System (MMS) for Oman electricity market. By the end of this year we are going to release the RFP related to the procurement of the MMS. What type of tendering process should be followed in OPWP for this procurement ?
Development of Feasible Alternatives
There are three feasible alternatives for the procurement of the MMS:
  1. Direct Tendering
  2. Limited Tender
  3. Open Tender


Development of the Outcome for Alternative
The following attributes are considered to check which alternative is more suitable for this problem
  • Process
  • Compete for Quality
  • Price
  • Collecting contacts


Table 1 lists the comparison date for the three alternatives.

Table 1. Data Alternative

Analysis and Comparison of the Alternative.

Using the compensatory approach, which consists of two models: Non-Dimensional Scaling and Additive Weighting Technique, the following results are calculated.
1.       Non-Dimensional Scaling
The below table shows the dimensionless values with a range from 0 to 1. Turning each attribute into a Base of 1 or dimensionless value, the scoring 1 means the highest/optimum value of attribute (preference decision). On the other hand, the scoring 0 means the minimum value (avoided decision).


Table 2. Dimensionless Scoring model

Table 3. Dimensionless Relative Weighting
Using the quantitative comparison for each attribute in table 2, the total score is calculated to represent the rank of an alternative (table 3). Using the non-dimensional scaling, both limited tender and open tender strategies got the highest rank with a total score 2.



2.       Additive Weighting Technique
Table 4 below, shows the calculation using the additive weighting technique, where ranking the considered attributes by giving higher rank to the preferred attribute. The totals show that having an open tender procurement for the Market Management System ranked the highest value as the best option.

Table 4. Additive Weighting Score
Selection of the Preferred Alternative.

According to table 4 results, the best alternative is processing an open tender practice.

Performance Monitoring and the Post Evaluation of Result.
Having an open tender is an international practice but sometimes during to the complexity and criticality of an IT system, the buyers go through a limited tender who are specialized in the system scope of work. Other attributes could be considered for the evaluation process. For the supplier selection evaluation process, many factors can be considered.
References
  1. Open tenders are not the best way to select agencies. (2011, March 8). Retrieved from https://www.trinityp3.com/2011/03/open-tenders-are-not-the-best-way-to-select-agencies/ 
  2. Advantages Of Open Tendering Construction Essay. (2015, March 23). Retrieved from https://www.ukessays.com/essays/construction/advantages-of-open-tendering-construction-essay.php 
  3. Mwikali, R., & Kavale, S. (2012). Factors affecting the selection of optimal suppliers in procurement management. International Journal of humanities and social science, 2(14), 189-193.
  4. Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Multi-criteria decision making methods. In Multi-criteria decision making methods: A comparative study (pp. 5-21). Springer, Boston, MA.
  5. Afshari, A., Mojahed, M., & Yusuff, R. M. (2010). Simple additive weighting approach to personnel selection problem. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 1(5), 511. 
  6. GUILD OF PROJECT CONTROLS COMPENDIUM and REFERENCE (CaR) | Project Controls - planning, scheduling, cost management and forensic analysis (Planning Planet). (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.planningplanet.com/guild/gpccar/managing-change-the-owners-perspective  


Comments

  1. Nice analysis, Ishaq!!! As you correctly noted, with results like this, where one option scores 0, another option scores 0.350 and the third option scores 1.0, I would be highly skeptical of the results and would either add in more options (feasible alternatives) OR increase the number of scoring attributes.

    Bottom line- I would NOT go to management with this research as the basis for a decision or a request for permission to move forward. It shows too much bias and not enough impartiality in the decision making process......

    I will accept this but would urge you to look at what you wrote in Step 7 and EXPAND upon your attributes. Why? Because history has shown us that IT projects in particular are prone to gross cost and time over-runs which stands as prima facie evidence that the current tendering system is broken and there needs to be a new or "better" approach.

    BR,
    Dr. PDG, Jakarta

    ReplyDelete
  2. PS Ishaq, one of the other "feasible alternatives" you could look at would be Agile Contracting-
    http://www.agilecontracts.org/
    https://www.infoq.com/articles/agile-contracts
    https://scrumology.com/an-overview-of-agile-contracts/
    http://www.scaledagileframework.com/agile-contracts/
    http://www.computerweekly.com/feature/How-to-write-supplier-contracts-for-agile-software-development

    I think this might give you the a much more "fair and balanced" ANALYSIS, even though the outcome may or may not change......

    BR,
    Dr. PDG, Jakarta

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W1_Thuraiya_Leadership Styles analysis Using Tuckman model

W1_MA_Tuckman Analysis Assignment