W2_Hilal_GAO Assessment of Schedule (Scoring Method)

By -
Problem Recognition

In our company we receive monthly reports for the project companies and it is important to review and analyze their schedule. However, currently, we are not following any standards or benchmark in order to assess how good or poor is the schedule. Sometimes, not enough information is provided in the schedule or the information misrepresented and all of this can lead wrong analysis of project status. Contractual obligation might be the reason, as we did not specify what to include in the schedule. The GAO assessment of schedule includes ten best practices which can be used as a checklist to assess the schedules we have in hand. Now, we need to develop a checklist that can tells how good or bad the schedule is.

Feasible alternative

The Guild of Project Controls Compendium and Reference suggests two methods for multi attributes decision making. Therefore, these two methods will be used to develop a scoring model which will help us to rate how healthy the schedule is. These methods are:
a.       non-compensatory approach
b.      compensatory approach

Outcomes from alternatives

-          Non- compensatory approach is effective when we are looking for specific features/ attributes. But this will rule out all other features whether they are relevant to assessment or not. In other words, non-compensatory does not trade-off a low value on one criterion against a high value on another attribute.
-          Compensatory approach, in the other hand, will compensate for all the features, therefore, this is effective to account for all features. This approach balances a low value on some criterion against a high value on another criterion.

Acceptance Criteria

The method I am looking for should include the following attributes:
·         Can it be built in excel spreadsheet?
·         Account for all features?
·         How score is calculated?
·         Can it include GAO assessment (ten best practices)?
·         Is it possible to account for HSE performance?
·         Can it provide rating?

Acceptance criteria vs. feasible alternatives
Importance
Compensatory
Non- compensatory
Criteria
A
B
A*B
C
C*A
Can it be built on excel spreadsheet?
2
4
8
4
8
Account for all features?
2
4
8
2
4
Provides Weighted score?
3
4
12
2
6
GAO best practices?
3
4
12
4
12
Accounts for HSE performance?
3
3
9
3
9
Rating results?
1
3
3
2
2
Total
52
Total
41
Table 1: Analysis of the feasible alternatives

The table above analyze the two approaches against acceptance criteria using weighted method. Column A, shows the importance of the criteria on scale of 1 to 3 where 3 being the most important. Columns B & C represents how the two approaches are meeting the criteria on scale of 1 to 4 where 4 means that it met the requirement.

Preferred Alternative

Based on the results in table 1, we conclude the compensatory approach is the preferred alternative.

Tracking/reporting plan

This alternative is to be used in developing an excel spreadsheet to evaluate the selected schedules.  The spreadsheet will include GAO assessment ten practices and other criterions. This approach will be used to account for all features/attributes in order to use the spreadsheet as a standard evaluation sheet to assess the reported schedules.

References
Avery, J. Kozinets, R. Mittal, B. Raghubir, P. & Woodside, A. (2012-2015). Decision Models: Compensatory and non-compensatory. Consumer Behavior. Retrieved from http://www.mycbbook.com/MYCBBook-Consumer-Decision-Judgment-Models.pdf
Gudigantala, N. (2014). A Study of the Compensatory and Non-Compensatory Decision. Journal of Applied Business and Economics. 16. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6fbd/2730915b8176d72b1215f81ba8aa2911d0b7.pdf

PP Admin. (2015). Multi- Attributes Decision. Guild of Project Controls Compendium and References. Retrieved from http://www.planningplanet.com/guild/gpccar/managing-change-the-owners-perspective

Comments

  1. Dr. PDGNovember 13, 2017 at 10:16 AM

    EXCELLENT 1st blog posting on your own. Very well done. Don't forget that there are TWO compensatory options you can choose from so you will have to do another analysis to decide which one is "best" or "better" to use for your analysis.

    Whichever one you choose, what you want to make sure of is that the results will provide you with a true ratio scale which not only will give you the rank order of of the GAO Attributes for assessing the health of your schedules but also the order of magnitude between any two or more of the options. http://study.com/academy/lesson/scales-of-measurement-nominal-ordinal-interval-ratio.html

    This way when you make your recommendations to management, you can show them the relative importance of each of the GAO attributes in the context of what is important to OPWP.

    BR,
    Dr. PDG, Jakarta

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W1_Thuraiya_Leadership Styles analysis Using Tuckman model

By -
Image
1-       Problem Recognition:          OPWP PMP team are currently at the stage of distance learning in the PMP course. The     team consist of 13 members and has started course from 29 th Oct and we’re aiming to be certified no later than 25 th Mar . During the current stage, every individual must submit a weekly blog related to a real work issue faced in the organization to determine the causes and the solutions. In  first blog Dr. Paul has requested  to measure the team development and behavior using   Tuckman’s Model. To insure the success of every project the  members must  understand the goals and the roles of each one to collaborate to achieve their goals. Further the team leader must understand his team behavior to know the most optimum leadership style must be adopted while managing the project.  2-      Identify the Feasible Alternative Tuckman model was established 5 decades ago. The model is dividing team behaviors into 4 stages the figure below
Read more
By -
Image
W1__Hamda__Tuckman Analysis Assignment__ 1-        Problem Definition After completion the first stage in PMP course which was conducted in Muscat from 29 th of October 2017 to 2 nd of November 2017 which was Face to Face stage, and following the formation of the OPWP-PMP team during this stage, the team is starting the second stage in this program which is the Distance Learning. Weekly Blog is one of the tasks in this stage. The first topic of the first weekly blog is suggested by Dr.Paul which is using Tuckman’s Model to know in which phase of this model the team is operated in and which style of leadership should be adopted in order to develop the team to achieve its goals. 2-        Identify the Feasible Alternative The Forming, Storming, Norming, and Performing model of group development was first proposed by Bruce Tuckman in 1965 who maintained that these phases are all necessary in order to develop the team, to face up any challenges, to find the suitable
Read more

W1_MA_Tuckman Analysis Assignment

By -
Image
Problem Definition Bruce Tuckman model used to identify the team status and the development phase of the project team. As the team go through these phases, different strategies should be implemented by the team leader and managers. This assessment will provide enough information for the team leader and even for the team members that would give a good understand the team performance.   Identify the Feasible Alternative There were 4 stages model of "forming, storming, norming, and performing" introduced by Bruce Tuckman in 1965. However, a fifth stage was added “adjourning” which describe the phase that the team go through after the achievement of project tasks and completion of the project. Figure 1 , development stages [2] In each phase, the leadership style should be in alignment with that specific phase which enhance the development of the team and improve the performance of the team as well. There are different styles that could be used by the team le
Read more