W7_Eman_Leadership Styles analysis Using Tuckman model




1.     Problem Definition

As recommended by Dr. PDG and in W1 blog is to repeat the Bruce Tuckman 4 stage model for Future OPWP 2017 group in week 4. To see in which stage the team currently operating in and how accurate is my result of W1 blog.



2.     Identify the Feasible Alternative

The 4-stage model Forming, Storming, Norming and Performing is published by Dr. Bruce Tuckman, then he added another stage called Adjourning. In order to be an effective manager, you should assess your team and see in which stage they fall. Beginning with a directing style, moving through coaching, then participating, finishing delegating and almost detached. At the end, the team will be able to produce a leader that can develop a new team.




3.     Development of the Outcome for Alternative

Future OPWP 2017 group should answers again all the 32 questions survey containing statements of teamwork. The scale is defined from 1 to 5 and each team Member scores each of the 32 questions using the following scale:

Scale
Response
1
Almost Never
2
Seldom
3
Occasionally
4
Frequently
5
Almost Always

Table 1. Scoring Scale

4.     Selection Criteria


After completing the Tuckman scoring model, the result of the Future OPWP 2017 team are summarized below:


Stage                  
Score
Rank
Forming
22
3
Storming
19
4
Norming
30
2
Performing
33
1







5.     Analysis and Comparison of the Alternative

The result show us, the Future OPWP 2017 team is in performing stage based on a highest score of 33. As the result show, us we still in performing stage and the analysis of W1 blog was true.

If it is measured in leadership style then it will be one of the four behaviors (telling, selling, participating and delegating). Based on the result of Bruce Tuckman, the Future OPWP 2017 group, is in delegating style.


6.     Selection of the Preferred Alternative

The preferred alternative is Norming as it is ranked second with the score 30. the preferred leadership style for Norming stage is participating.

7.      Performance Monitoring and the Post Evaluation of Result

It is recommended to maintain the same performance of the group to end up with good result.

References

1.     Scoring the Tuckman Team Maturity Questionnaire Electronically. retrieved from http://www.phf.org/resourcestools/Documents/Electronic_Tuckman.pdf






3.     Team technology – Leadership using the Tuckman Model.                        Retrieved from (http://http://www.teamtechnology.co.uk/tuckman.htmlf)

Comments

  1. OK , Eman if that is what the team believes....... But then how do you explain the relatively poor SPI and CPI results? SPI in particular?

    See where I am going with this? What you BELIEVE to be the case is not supported by the RESULTS.

    How can or should you explain that? Tuckman shows that you are performing but the results don't match your ATTITUDE???

    Interesting quandary and I hope you will post a follow on interpretation.

    BR,
    Dr. PDG, Jakarta

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W1_Thuraiya_Leadership Styles analysis Using Tuckman model

W1_MA_Tuckman Analysis Assignment