W8_ISHAQ_Development_Language

By -

Problem Definition

In-house development is a key process of the IT department. The department is in its structuring and phase and last week my blog was about the development environment solution that we should use it for software’s development. There are many development languages being used in the industry and we are looking to choose the language that helps the team to deliver an efficient applications and easy to use.
Development of Feasible Alternatives
There are four feasible alternatives for the programming languages:
  1. Java
  2. C#
  3. Python
  4. PHP

Development of the Outcome for Alternative
The following attributes are considered to check which alternative is more suitable for this problem
  • Popularity
  • Docs and knowledge
  • Built-in security
  • Execution Speed

Table 1 lists the comparison date for the three alternatives.

Table 1. Data Alternative
 Analysis and Comparison of the Alternative.
 Using the compensatory approach, which consists of two models: Non-Dimensional Scaling and Additive Weighting Technique, the following results are calculated.
1.       Non-Dimensional Scaling
The below table shows the dimensionless values with a range from 0 to 1. Turning each attribute into a Base of 1 or dimensionless value, the scoring 1 means the highest/optimum value of attribute (preference decision). On the other hand, the scoring 0 means the minimum value (avoided decision).


Table 2. Dimensionless Scoring model

Table 3. Dimensionless Relative Weighting
Using the quantitative comparison for each attribute in table 2, the total score is calculated to represent the rank of an alternative (table 3). Using the non-dimensional scaling, JAVA programming language got the highest rank with a total score 2.67.
2.       Additive Weighting Technique
Table 4 below, shows the calculation using the additive weighting technique, where ranking the considered attributes by giving higher rank to the preferred attribute. The totals show that using JAVA as a programming language for the development of in-house applications ranked the highest value as the best option.

Table 4. Additive Weighting Score
Selection of the Preferred Alternative.

According to table 4 results, the best alternative is JAVA programming language.

Performance Monitoring and the Post Evaluation of Result.
There is a rapid development in the IT related services. The cloud computing is an option that we might need to utilize in the department and the use of JAVA programming language might not be the optimal option for this technology. A close monitoring of the applications performance and the users needs might lead to consider another option for the development.
References
  1. Programming Languages Comparison. (2009, February 27). Retrieved from https://wowjava.wordpress.com/2009/01/15/programming-languages-comparison/
  2. A comparison of the most popular programming languages of 2015. Needs more overlapping bubbles. ? r/dataisugly. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.reddit.com/r/dataisugly/comments/356rfo/a_comparison_of_the_most_popular_programming/
  3. Which Is The Best And Easiest Language To Learn For Software Tester/Testing. (2017, April 30). Retrieved from https://www.blog10.website/best-easiest-programing-scripting-language-tester-learns-for-automation-testing/
  4. TI-Nspire Python: STEM programming... - Cemetech | Forum | Technology & Calculator Open Topic [Topic]. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.cemetech.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=10720
  5.  Mwikali, R., & Kavale, S. (2012). Factors affecting the selection of optimal suppliers in procurement management. International Journal of humanities and social science, 2(14), 189-193.
  6. Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Multi-criteria decision making methods. In Multi-criteria decision making methods: A comparative study (pp. 5-21). Springer, Boston, MA.
  7. Afshari, A., Mojahed, M., & Yusuff, R. M. (2010). Simple additive weighting approach to personnel selection problem. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 1(5), 511.
  8. GUILD OF PROJECT CONTROLS COMPENDIUM and REFERENCE (CaR) | Project Controls - planning, scheduling, cost management and forensic analysis (Planning Planet). (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.planningplanet.com/guild/gpccar/managing-change-the-owners-perspective


Comments

  1. Dr. PDGJanuary 4, 2018 at 5:21 AM

    WOW!!!! AWESOME case study, Ishaq!!! Very impressed to see you actually using some of the tools/techniques you have learned in this course.

    This is a perfect example of how we can measure and assess "Return on Training Investment" (RoTI).

    Keep up the great work and looking forward to seeing more examples showing us how you are actually using what you learned to solve real challenges facing you in your day to day working environment!!!

    BR,
    Dr. PDG Jakarta

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W1_Thuraiya_Leadership Styles analysis Using Tuckman model

By -
Image
1-       Problem Recognition:          OPWP PMP team are currently at the stage of distance learning in the PMP course. The     team consist of 13 members and has started course from 29 th Oct and we’re aiming to be certified no later than 25 th Mar . During the current stage, every individual must submit a weekly blog related to a real work issue faced in the organization to determine the causes and the solutions. In  first blog Dr. Paul has requested  to measure the team development and behavior using   Tuckman’s Model. To insure the success of every project the  members must  understand the goals and the roles of each one to collaborate to achieve their goals. Further the team leader must understand his team behavior to know the most optimum leadership style must be adopted while managing the project.  2-      Identify the Feasible Alternative Tuckman model was established 5 decades ago. The model is dividing team behaviors into 4 stages the figure below
Read more
By -
Image
W1__Hamda__Tuckman Analysis Assignment__ 1-        Problem Definition After completion the first stage in PMP course which was conducted in Muscat from 29 th of October 2017 to 2 nd of November 2017 which was Face to Face stage, and following the formation of the OPWP-PMP team during this stage, the team is starting the second stage in this program which is the Distance Learning. Weekly Blog is one of the tasks in this stage. The first topic of the first weekly blog is suggested by Dr.Paul which is using Tuckman’s Model to know in which phase of this model the team is operated in and which style of leadership should be adopted in order to develop the team to achieve its goals. 2-        Identify the Feasible Alternative The Forming, Storming, Norming, and Performing model of group development was first proposed by Bruce Tuckman in 1965 who maintained that these phases are all necessary in order to develop the team, to face up any challenges, to find the suitable
Read more

W1_MA_Tuckman Analysis Assignment

By -
Image
Problem Definition Bruce Tuckman model used to identify the team status and the development phase of the project team. As the team go through these phases, different strategies should be implemented by the team leader and managers. This assessment will provide enough information for the team leader and even for the team members that would give a good understand the team performance.   Identify the Feasible Alternative There were 4 stages model of "forming, storming, norming, and performing" introduced by Bruce Tuckman in 1965. However, a fifth stage was added “adjourning” which describe the phase that the team go through after the achievement of project tasks and completion of the project. Figure 1 , development stages [2] In each phase, the leadership style should be in alignment with that specific phase which enhance the development of the team and improve the performance of the team as well. There are different styles that could be used by the team le
Read more