W9__Hamda__ Determining the amount of Incentives and
Disincentives for Power and Water Projects__Part3
1-
Problem
Definition
Any project in the world example Industrial Projects
such as: Power Generation plants, Water Desalination plants, Power and Water
Plants, Refineries, and any other industrial projects have 3 main stages. The
first stage is the Bidding stage, where all the project details, and all
specifications refer to the design of the plant and the technologies to be
used, the site selected for the project are set in such documents- Project
Definition Documents. The second stage which is the main important stage in the
project life cycle since the third stage depends on it is the Implementation
stage or in other word is the Construction stage. In this stage, the
construction of the project will be started, so any fault or any delay in this
stage will cause a delay in the whole project which will cause a delay in the
production of the project which will put the different parties of the projects
in troubles. So, to avoid the construction delays or other difficulties during
the Construction Stage, the proper planning and scheduling of the project tasks
and activities will be very useful. Moreover, there is another way that can be
implemented to avoid any delays in the construction side, which can be
implemented contractually in the Contract. This way is to applied Incentive Contracts
or it can be Incentive Clause in the such Agreements. This blog and the coming
blogs will discuss the way of determining the amount of incentives and
disincentives.
2-
Identify
the Feasible Alternative
FHWA’s Contract Administration Core
Curriculum (CACC) Manual defines I/D for early completion as “A contract
provision which compensates the contractor for each day that identified
critical work is completed ahead of schedule and assesses a deduction for each
day that completion of the critical work is delayed.
In order to establish the amount of Incentives to be paid from the
Owner Company to the Contractor and when to be paid, important to have a
specific curve known as Total Cumulative Project Cost (Owner and
Contractor) which is a combination of
·
Total
Contractor’s Cost Curve
·
Total
Cumulative Owner Overhead and Lost Opportunity Cost.
·
Total
Cumulative Project Cost (Owner and Contractor).
These
curves will be determined separately, each one in each blog.
3-
Development
of the outcome of Alternative
In this blog, a project with 500 MW will be
studied and analyzed. This project will take 30 months to be duly completed. The
Cost Estimate for this project (the cumulative cost of contractor and owner) is
($2.85 Billion). As shown in table 1.
Contractor Estimates
|
US $ Billion
|
Engineering
|
0.250
|
Procurement
|
0.900
|
Construction
|
0.750
|
Total
|
1.90
|
Owner’s Costs
|
US $ Billion
|
PMT & Support
|
0.650
|
Office Cost
|
0.150
|
Others
|
0.150
|
Total
|
0.950
|
Overall Total
|
2.85
|
4-
Selection Criteria
The next alternative to be
developed in this blog (part 3) is Total
Cumulative Project Cost (Owner and Contractor). Total Cumulative Project Cost Curve is a combination of the two
above curves (the Contractor’s Costs Curve and the Owner’s Overhead and
Opportunity Costs Curve). And the process of developing this curve, is to sum
the values of the both curves. Figure 1 describes the Total Cumulative Project
Cost Curve.
5- Analysis and comparison of
the Alternative
Figure 2: Schedule vs Time
Optimization Curve
The curve above shows the cumulative sum of the previous two
curves such as: The Total
Contractor’s Cost Curve and the Total Cumulative Owner Overhead and Lost
Opportunity Cost.
The Contractor’s optimum cost and
duration is determined based on the agreed duration and agreed cost in the
Contract between the contractor and the owner which is in this case is 30-month and $ 1.9B respectively. Moreover, the owner’s optimum cost is the cost where the
cost curve is the lowest and at what it occurs which is in this case is 24-months and $ 3.2B. The determination of the maximum duration overrun will be by allowing
one month for every year of the project. So, in this case will be month-33.
6-
Selection of the preferred Alternative
No alternative for this curve since it depends on the Total
Contractor’s Cost curve and Total
Cumulative Owner Overhead and Lost Opportunity Cost,
and as it the last part (part 3) of developing the model by which the amount of
Incentive and disincentive will be determined in next blog (part 4).
7-
Performance Monitoring and the Post Evaluation of result
After developing the
3 curves in three blogs (part 1, 2, &3), the last curve will be developed
is the total curve which shows the model results and by establishing that
model, the analysing and determining the amount of incentives/ disincentives
will be done (blog part 4).
References:
1- Stephen J.C. Paterson (2017), Incentivizing Early Completion of
Major Oil and Gas Projects, from http://pmworldjournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/pmwj64-Nov2017-Paterson-incentivizing-early-completion-of-oil-and-gas-projects.pdf
2- Hamda Al Malki (2017), Incentive
Contracts and its effects on Power and Water projects, Retrieved on 8 January 2018.
3- Incentive Contracting - Incentives, Award
Fee, Award Term, from https://www.dau.mil/acquipedia/Pages/ArticleDetails.aspx?aid=1c0fe484-43f8-4149-97bf-63bafefdf8ae
Looking very good......!!!!
ReplyDeleteBR,
Dr. PDG, Jakarta