W2 Blog /Hamed AL Foori
Week 2 Blog: Improving HSE Reporting Mechanism to the OPWP’s HSE
Department
Problem Background
The
Project Implementation Department receives monthly progress reports from all the
power and water projects under construction. Health, Safety and Environment
statistics for that month are included in the report. These statistics are
crucial to OPWP to ensure projects are being carried out in a safe manner and
as per the local and international laws and standards. Once these statistics are
received, the PI department transfer these data to the HSE department for their
review. A common issue in this monthly task includes reporting late reporting
of HSE data and reporting incorrect numbers in some occasions.
The
goal is to come up with new HSE reporting mechanism to ensure data validation and
shorter reporting time.
Root Cause Analysis
by Problem Tree Analysis
Figure 1: Root
Cause Analysis of Low Quality HSE Reporting
The
root cause analysis shows that because reporting HSE statistics is required as
a monthly basis as soon as information has received, data extraction and lack
of communication between the HSE department and the site contributes to some
confusion and delay in reporting the statistics.
Feasible Alternatives
Because
the current task is being done by the project engineer, there are three feasible
alternatives to solve or fix the root cause problem as explained above for
improving reporting and recording of HSE statistics.
1- Developing Master HSE Excel Sheet to be used by the HSE Officer.
The
Master HSE Sheet will consist of VPA program to extract all the HSE statistics from
multiple progress reports.
2- To develop an online HSE monitoring tool
HSE monitoring
tool will be used between the HSE officer and the project owner to upload HSE
statistics on the website and to be monitored remotely. Companies like
Schlumberger is currently utilizing technology to obtain immediate HSE
performance data, which are available to all staff. Such a tool provides accessibility
to HSE reports, events and tracking records.
3- HSE officer to take the task.
HSE
officer to do the current task of extracting the data manually once the reports
have been received.
Outcomes of Each Alternative
Method (Pros and Cons):
Table 1: Advantages
and disadvantages of each HSE reporting mechanisms proposed for the HSE
Department.
Alternative Reporting Mechanism
|
Advantages
|
Disadvantages
|
HSE
Master Sheet
|
-
Fast extraction of data from progress reports.
- Task
could be done by anyone
|
- Stakeholders
need to agree on the format.
|
Online HSE Monitor
|
-
Quick notification of HSE cases.
-
No manipulation of HSE data
|
- Stakeholders to agree to share HSE data online.
-
HSE data may not be updated online.
|
Manual Task by HSE Officer
|
-
HSE officer is in charge of the HSE reporting and will have direct contact
with project owner.
|
HSE
officer may not accept this mechanism
|
Selection of Acceptable
Criteria
Based
on the advantages and disadvantages of each reporting mechanisms explained in
Table 1, the acceptance criteria can be developed to be as following:
1- Time: It is crucial to transfer the data from all the progress reports
into the HSE Department database in the shortest possible time.
2- Efforts required to develop the technique: This criterion
explains that the technique should be feasible to be developed and does not
require much recourses.
3- Easiness of implementing the mechanism: This criterion
explains how easy it is to use the selected reporting technique and to be
implemented between the stakeholders effectively.
Comparing the Proposed
Reporting Mechanism with the Acceptable Criteria
The
following table examines each mechanism against the acceptable criteria defined
in the previous section to determine the best feasible option. The ranking
method will be from 0 to 4 where 0 is very low/poor/difficult and 4 is very
high/easy
Key: Time (4:
Short time required for reporting, 0: Long time)
Development Effort (4: Very hard to
develop, 0: no effort to develop)
Easiness to Implement (4: Easy to be
implemented and accepted, 0: hard to be accepted)
Technique/ Acceptance Criteria
|
Time
|
Development Effort
|
Easiness to Implementation
|
Total Score
|
HSE Excel Sheet
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
8
|
Online Monitor
|
4
|
0
|
1
|
5
|
Manually by HSE Officer
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
6
|
Table 3: Pair-Wise Comparison for Each
Acceptable Criteria Against the HSE Reporting Mechanism
Selection of the Best
Alternative Reporting Mechanism
From
the previous study, it was found that developing an HSE master excel file to
report HSE statistics is more feasible since once the excel file is ready, it
does not take that much of time to report the data and it’s easy to be
implemented and accepted by all parties but it may take some effort to develop
the format of the excel sheet. Over all, the first alternative scored the
highest with 8 points.
Implementation on the Real
World
Because
of the current challenges we are currently facing in reporting the HSE data, it’s
time to implement a new methodology by ensuring quality and reducing time. This
new HSE master sheet will allow smooth reporting between projects under
construction and OPWP’s HSE Department.
After
having the sheet format accepted between all parties, a tracking sheet may be
used to track the time consumed on reporting as well as how smoothly it is
being implemented. The results then will be compared with the current situation
to see whether there was earned value from this small project.
Reference:
Creating a Pairwise Comparison Chart. (n.d.). Retrieved
from http://www.eahoover.com/dconn-web/EDP/Developing_a_PCC.pdf
European Integration Office. (n.d.). Guide to
THE LOGICAL FRAMEWORK APPROACH. Retrieved from http://www.evropa.gov.rs/evropa/ShowDocument.aspx?Type=Home&Id=525
Health, Safety and the Environment (HSE). (2017). Retrieved
from http://www.slb.com/hse.aspx
Hi Hamed,
ReplyDeleteGotta be careful of using this method alone when there are many other methods. What I would hope you would do is invest the time to explore ALL of the root cause analysis methods and then come back to this posting and see if you still think this one is the "best" approach to use in your case?
http://www.brighthubpm.com/risk-management/114834-comparing-root-cause-analysis-techniques/
http://www.realitycharting.com/_public/site/files/pdf/ARCA_Appendix.pdf..
http://www.realitycharting.com/methodology/conventional-wisdom/rca-methods-compared
They all have strengths and weaknesses and using the wrong tool/technique for the purpose you have in mind is like your carpenter using a sledge hammer to install your kitchen cabinetry.....
Bottom line- I would urge you to explore more than just this particular tool/technique.
BR,
Dr. PDG, Jakarta