Week
3 Blog/ Hamed AL Foori– Stakeholder Management During Project Execution
Problem Background
Stakeholder management is a key success
towards reaching the final objective of a project. Because different parties
are being involved in the project in some way or another, it has been essential
to develop a Stakeholder Management Plan as part of the project documents to
identify and manage stakeholders during the implementation phase of the
project.
The current challenge is that lack of stakeholder management by the project company (the owner) causes misunderstanding and, as a result, delays in achieving certain project’s milestones. This exercise is to identify stakeholders associated with power and water projects and evaluate their interests and influence accordingly.
The current challenge is that lack of stakeholder management by the project company (the owner) causes misunderstanding and, as a result, delays in achieving certain project’s milestones. This exercise is to identify stakeholders associated with power and water projects and evaluate their interests and influence accordingly.
Why do we care?
The lack
of effective communication management can trigger challenges which would
results in project’s delays. The major challenges associated with the previous
and current projects are as below:
1-
Obtaining Permits from respective stakeholders.
2-
Finalizing physical interfaces.
3-
Meeting other contractual obligations.
Any
delays in managing stakeholders could potentially cause a delay in the project.
Therefore, it was essential to involve all
Actions to Solve the Problem
(Feasible Alternative):
To
effectively monitor stakeholders’ performance, a Stakeholder Management Plan is
required after developing the project and prior start of execution. The first
step to develop the plan is stakeholder identification where common
stakeholders of Independent Power and Water Projects are as below:
Table 1:
Stakeholder Identification Table
Type
|
Stakeholder
|
Category
|
|
External
|
Government
|
Authority of Electricity
Generation
|
Regulator
|
Ministry of Oil and
Gas
|
Decision
Maker
|
||
Ministry of Housing
|
Decision
Maker
|
||
Ministry of
Environment and Climate Affairs
|
Regulator
|
||
Ministry of
municipalities and water resources
|
Decision
Maker
|
||
Royal Oman Police
|
Decision
Maker
|
||
Public Authority of
Electricity and Water
|
Regulator
|
||
Public
|
Communities and People
|
Negative
Beneficiaries
|
|
Private
Sector
|
Oman Electricity
Transmission Company
|
Beneficiaries
|
|
Electricity
Distribution Companies
|
Beneficiaries
|
||
Majis Industrial
Services
|
Beneficiaries
|
||
Oman Gas Company
|
Beneficiaries
|
||
Sohar Port Company
|
Beneficiaries
|
||
Internal
|
OPWP
|
Development Department
|
Decision
Maker
|
Legal Department
|
Decision
Maker
|
||
Planning Department
|
Decision
Maker
|
||
Implementation
Department
|
Decision
Maker
|
||
Client Contract and
Interface Department
|
Decision
Maker
|
||
Other
|
Consultants and
Advisors
|
Beneficiaries
|
Outcomes of the Actions:
After
identifying common stakeholders who are involved in power and water projects,
it is required to rank them based on their influence and interest. Opinions regarding
stakeholder’s power/interest were obtained from subject matter experts through
a short survey. The survey asks the expert to rank each stakeholder’s interest
and power from 1 to 5. Results from each expert were collected and averaged
among other results.
Overall,
stakeholders fall in four main categories (in relation to power and interest):
1-
Keep satisfied: those who have high influence but low interest.
2-
Keep encourage and influence: those who have high power and interest.
3-
Keep informed: those who have high interest but low power.
4-
Keep monitor: those who have low power and interest.
Selection Criteria of the
Outcomes:
The following table summarizes results of the
survey for each stakeholder mentioned above.
Table 2: Survey’s
Results of Stakeholder Identification.
|
Stakeholder
|
Interest (Avg.)
|
Power
(Avg.)
|
|
Government
|
Authority of
Electricity Regulation (AER)
|
4.2
|
5
|
|
Ministry of Finance (MoF)
|
3.4
|
5
|
||
Ministry of Oil and
Gas (MoG)
|
2
|
3.2
|
||
Ministry of Housing (MoH)
|
1.2
|
4.2
|
||
Ministry of
Environment and Climate Affairs (MECA)
|
1.2
|
4.4
|
||
Ministry of Legal
Affairs (MLA)
|
1.3
|
3.2
|
||
Ministry of
Municipalities and Water Resources (MMER)
|
1.6
|
2
|
||
Royal Oman Police
(ROP)
|
1
|
2.2
|
||
Public Authority of
Electricity and Water (PAEW)
|
4.4
|
4.2
|
||
Electricity Holding
Company (EHC)
|
2.8
|
3.2
|
||
Local Communities (LC)
|
3.6
|
1.6
|
||
Private Sector
|
Oman Electricity
Transmission Company (OETC)
|
3
|
4
|
|
Electricity
Distribution Companies (EDCs)
|
3.2
|
3.4
|
||
Majis Industrial
Services (Sohar)
|
2.6
|
2.2
|
||
Oman Gas Company (MOG)
|
1.8
|
3
|
||
Petroleum Development
Oman (PDO)
|
1.8
|
1.8
|
||
Sohar Industrial Port
Company (SIPC)
|
2.6
|
2.6
|
||
Others
|
||||
OPWP
|
Development Department
(PD)
|
4.2
|
4.6
|
|
Regulatory Compliance
Department (RC)
|
2.8
|
4.6
|
||
Spot Market
|
3.2
|
3
|
||
Planning Department (P&E)
|
4
|
3.8
|
||
Implementation
Department (PI)
|
5
|
5
|
||
Client Contract and
Interface Department (CCI)
|
4
|
3.6
|
||
Other
|
Consultants and
Advisors (C&A)
|
3.2
|
2.4
|
Analysis and Comparison of the
Outcomes:
After
collecting all the data from SMEs, a stakeholder mapping tool will be used to illustrate
the relation of power and interest for each stakeholder. Note that this is an
overall analysis as this map is dynamically changing from each stage of the
project to another.
Figure1:
Stakeholder Map Analysis
From
the stakeholder analysis above, it can be concluded that most of the government
entities have high influence in making decisions, but on the other hand, they
may have low interest in getting onboard towards developing and executing the
projects. While the functional departments of OPWP (planning, developing,
implementing and monitoring) are on the “High High” category, the private sector
is distributed on the chart between the “Low Low” for non-power/water companies
and “High High” for power/water companies.
Tracking the Implementing the stakeholder’s
register
Such
a stakeholder register document shall be required as part of the project
charter in order to evaluate the interfaces of the project at the earliest
stage of the execution phase. Because the stakeholder register is dynamically changing
as new stakeholders appear on the stage, the project manager shall update the
register document accordingly and monitor each stakeholder’s performance through
the stakeholder management plan.
Reference
A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide).(2013).
Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
GUILD OF PROJECT CONTROLS COMPENDIUM and REFERENCE
(CaR). (2015, November 2). Retrieved from http://www.planningplanet.com/guild/gpccar/identifying-engaging-stakeholders
Terezinha
Hignett. (2017, April 20). Poor Communication Leads to Project Failure One
Third of the Time. Retrieved from http://www.coreworx.com/pmi-study-reveals-poor-communication-leads-to-project-failure-one-third-of-the-time/
Good evening Hamed, good job on your posting.
ReplyDeleteDid you see the postings from Mazim https://pmpopwp.blogspot.co.id/2017/11/w3mafurther-analysis-of-extarnal.html?showComment=1511259390302#c2122371312201063915 and Juhaina? https://pmpopwp.blogspot.co.id/2017/11/w3juhainathird-party-stakeholder.html?showComment=1511259885093#c6294627297027921207
As this seems to be a topic of significant interest, if anyone is still struggling to find a paper topic, I really think that creating a MADM model Stakeholder Assessment using one of the two COMPENSATORY approaches would make a truly interesting and valuable paper....
BR,
Dr. PDG, Jakarta
Hi Dr. Paul,
DeleteThank you for the feedback. I will be searching about using MADM for my next stakeholder analysis, but can you provide me with a quick/short example of how the compensatory approach in creating MADM model can be used in my case ?
Appreciate your input on this.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete