By -

W7_Eman_Leadership Styles analysis Using Tuckman model




1.     Problem Definition

As recommended by Dr. PDG and in W1 blog is to repeat the Bruce Tuckman 4 stage model for Future OPWP 2017 group in week 4. To see in which stage the team currently operating in and how accurate is my result of W1 blog.



2.     Identify the Feasible Alternative

The 4-stage model Forming, Storming, Norming and Performing is published by Dr. Bruce Tuckman, then he added another stage called Adjourning. In order to be an effective manager, you should assess your team and see in which stage they fall. Beginning with a directing style, moving through coaching, then participating, finishing delegating and almost detached. At the end, the team will be able to produce a leader that can develop a new team.




3.     Development of the Outcome for Alternative

Future OPWP 2017 group should answers again all the 32 questions survey containing statements of teamwork. The scale is defined from 1 to 5 and each team Member scores each of the 32 questions using the following scale:

Scale
Response
1
Almost Never
2
Seldom
3
Occasionally
4
Frequently
5
Almost Always

Table 1. Scoring Scale

4.     Selection Criteria


After completing the Tuckman scoring model, the result of the Future OPWP 2017 team are summarized below:


Stage                  
Score
Rank
Forming
22
3
Storming
19
4
Norming
30
2
Performing
33
1







5.     Analysis and Comparison of the Alternative

The result show us, the Future OPWP 2017 team is in performing stage based on a highest score of 33. As the result show, us we still in performing stage and the analysis of W1 blog was true.

If it is measured in leadership style then it will be one of the four behaviors (telling, selling, participating and delegating). Based on the result of Bruce Tuckman, the Future OPWP 2017 group, is in delegating style.


6.     Selection of the Preferred Alternative

The preferred alternative is Norming as it is ranked second with the score 30. the preferred leadership style for Norming stage is participating.

7.      Performance Monitoring and the Post Evaluation of Result

It is recommended to maintain the same performance of the group to end up with good result.

References

1.     Scoring the Tuckman Team Maturity Questionnaire Electronically. retrieved from http://www.phf.org/resourcestools/Documents/Electronic_Tuckman.pdf






3.     Team technology – Leadership using the Tuckman Model.                        Retrieved from (http://http://www.teamtechnology.co.uk/tuckman.htmlf)

Comments

  1. Dr. PDGNovember 30, 2017 at 9:17 AM

    OK , Eman if that is what the team believes....... But then how do you explain the relatively poor SPI and CPI results? SPI in particular?

    See where I am going with this? What you BELIEVE to be the case is not supported by the RESULTS.

    How can or should you explain that? Tuckman shows that you are performing but the results don't match your ATTITUDE???

    Interesting quandary and I hope you will post a follow on interpretation.

    BR,
    Dr. PDG, Jakarta

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W1_Thuraiya_Leadership Styles analysis Using Tuckman model

By -
Image
1-       Problem Recognition:          OPWP PMP team are currently at the stage of distance learning in the PMP course. The     team consist of 13 members and has started course from 29 th Oct and we’re aiming to be certified no later than 25 th Mar . During the current stage, every individual must submit a weekly blog related to a real work issue faced in the organization to determine the causes and the solutions. In  first blog Dr. Paul has requested  to measure the team development and behavior using   Tuckman’s Model. To insure the success of every project the  members must  understand the goals and the roles of each one to collaborate to achieve their goals. Further the team leader must understand his team behavior to know the most optimum leadership style must be adopted while managing the project.  2-      Identify the Feasible Alternative Tuckman m...
Read more
By -
Image
W1__Hamda__Tuckman Analysis Assignment__ 1-        Problem Definition After completion the first stage in PMP course which was conducted in Muscat from 29 th of October 2017 to 2 nd of November 2017 which was Face to Face stage, and following the formation of the OPWP-PMP team during this stage, the team is starting the second stage in this program which is the Distance Learning. Weekly Blog is one of the tasks in this stage. The first topic of the first weekly blog is suggested by Dr.Paul which is using Tuckman’s Model to know in which phase of this model the team is operated in and which style of leadership should be adopted in order to develop the team to achieve its goals. 2-        Identify the Feasible Alternative The Forming, Storming, Norming, and Performing model of group development was first proposed by Bruce Tuckman in 1965 who maintained that these phases are all necessary in order to develop...
Read more

W1_MA_Tuckman Analysis Assignment

By -
Image
Problem Definition Bruce Tuckman model used to identify the team status and the development phase of the project team. As the team go through these phases, different strategies should be implemented by the team leader and managers. This assessment will provide enough information for the team leader and even for the team members that would give a good understand the team performance.   Identify the Feasible Alternative There were 4 stages model of "forming, storming, norming, and performing" introduced by Bruce Tuckman in 1965. However, a fifth stage was added “adjourning” which describe the phase that the team go through after the achievement of project tasks and completion of the project. Figure 1 , development stages [2] In each phase, the leadership style should be in alignment with that specific phase which enhance the development of the team and improve the performance of the team as well. There are different styles that could be used by the team le...
Read more